<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: darwin</title>
	<link>http://www.kquee.com/blog/2005/03/27/darwin/</link>
	<description>Perspectives on Technology, Business, Marketing and Communications from the tiny island-nation of Singapore</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Sandiego</title>
		<link>http://www.kquee.com/blog/2005/03/27/darwin/#comment-147</link>
		<author>Sandiego</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 16:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kquee.com/blog/2005/03/27/darwin/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Hi, just a passerby with thought to offer.

Gen 1:21 - And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that [it was] good. 

"after its kind" tells us that the creatures God created would not change kind (species). Granted, human beings "evolve" through the ages in terms of physical appearance (afro's hands bigger, chinese small eyes...) but a believer of the Bible would find it contradicting the phrase "after its kind" when he/she wants to believe we can change from monkeys to man.

evolution - happened over many years. so before man come to being there are creations which died? If that's the case, that contradicts the Bible again. The Bible says that death came when adam and eve (man) sinned, not before that. So evolution, which gives a timespan wide enough for death, would contradict the Bible's main doctrine of the wages of sin.

By the way i'm not one who denies science for religion. God made all things and all things are for us to discover. But I do not subscribe to evolution for the above reasons and just want to let you know. just as a food for thought. 

Sandiego
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, just a passerby with thought to offer.</p>
<p>Gen 1:21 - And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that [it was] good. </p>
<p>&#8220;after its kind&#8221; tells us that the creatures God created would not change kind (species). Granted, human beings &#8220;evolve&#8221; through the ages in terms of physical appearance (afro&#8217;s hands bigger, chinese small eyes&#8230;) but a believer of the Bible would find it contradicting the phrase &#8220;after its kind&#8221; when he/she wants to believe we can change from monkeys to man.</p>
<p>evolution - happened over many years. so before man come to being there are creations which died? If that&#8217;s the case, that contradicts the Bible again. The Bible says that death came when adam and eve (man) sinned, not before that. So evolution, which gives a timespan wide enough for death, would contradict the Bible&#8217;s main doctrine of the wages of sin.</p>
<p>By the way i&#8217;m not one who denies science for religion. God made all things and all things are for us to discover. But I do not subscribe to evolution for the above reasons and just want to let you know. just as a food for thought. </p>
<p>Sandiego<br />
:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.kquee.com/blog/2005/03/27/darwin/#comment-16</link>
		<author>Jack</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kquee.com/blog/2005/03/27/darwin/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>By the way, I &lt;a href="http://www.google.com.sg/search?hl=en&#38;q=science+without+religion+is+lame%2C+religion+without+science+is+blind&#38;meta=" rel="nofollow"&gt;googled&lt;/a&gt; on Albert Einstein's quote on &lt;a href="http://en.thinkexist.com/quotation/science_without_religion_is_lame-religion_without/15560.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, I <a href="http://www.google.com.sg/search?hl=en&amp;q=science+without+religion+is+lame%2C+religion+without+science+is+blind&amp;meta=" rel="nofollow">googled</a> on Albert Einstein&#8217;s quote on <a href="http://en.thinkexist.com/quotation/science_without_religion_is_lame-religion_without/15560.html" rel="nofollow">Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.kquee.com/blog/2005/03/27/darwin/#comment-15</link>
		<author>Jack</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kquee.com/blog/2005/03/27/darwin/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind. -- Albert Einstein</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind. &#8212; Albert Einstein</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
